WASHINGTON — The new head of the Social Security Administration said Wednesday that deceased centenarians are “not necessarily receiving benefits," contradicting claims that tens of millions of dead people over the age of 100 are getting payments from the agency.
Lee Dudek, the new acting SSA commissioner who was placed in the role by , gave the clarification after Trump and falsely claimed on social media and in news briefings that people who are 100, 200 and even 300 years old are improperly and routinely getting benefits.
While it is true that improper payments were made, including some to dead people, the numbers thrown out by Trump and Musk are overstated and misrepresent Social Security data.
What has the Trump administration said about payments to centenarians?
On Tuesday, Trump said at a news briefing in Florida that “we have millions and millions of people over 100 years old” receiving Social Security benefits.
Musk, whose Department of Government Efficiency is seeking to root out fraud, waste and abuse, issued posts Monday night on his social media platform X, including: “Maybe Twilight is real and there are a lot of vampires collecting Social Security” and “Having tens of millions of people marked in Social Security as 'ALIVE' when they are definitely dead is a HUGE problem. Obviously. Some of these people would have been alive before America existed as a country. Think about that for a second …”
So are tens of millions of people over 100 years old receiving benefits?
No.
Part of the confusion comes from Social Security’s software system based on the COBOL programming language, which has a lack of date type. This means that some entries with missing or incomplete birthdates will default to a reference point of more than 150 years ago. The news organization WIRED first reported on the use of COBOL programming language at the Social Security Administration.
from the Social Security Administration’s inspector general in March 2023 and July 2024 state that the agency has not established a new system to properly annotate death information in its database, which included roughly 18.9 million Social Security numbers of people born in 1920 or earlier but were not marked as deceased. This does not mean, however, that these individuals were receiving benefits.
The agency decided not to update the database because the cost would run upward of $9 million.
states that "almost none of the numberholders discussed in the report currently receive SSA payments.” As of September 2015, the agency automatically stops payments to people who are older than 115 years old.
What does the acting Social Security commissioner say about that?
Dudek, named acting chief of the Social Security Administration after the , issued a news release Wednesday reiterating the agency's commitment to transparency. It acknowledged recent reporting about people older than 100 receiving benefits from the agency.
He seemed to confirm that confusion rose because of the default settings on the database.
“The reported data are people in our records with a Social Security number who do not have a date of death associated with their record. These individuals are not necessarily receiving benefits," Dudek said.
“I am confident that with DOGE’s help and the commitment of our executive team and workforce, that Social Security will continue to deliver for the American people,” he said.
How big of a problem is Social Security fraud?
from Social Security’s inspector general states that from fiscal years 2015 through 2022, the agency paid out almost $8.6 trillion in benefits, including $71.8 billion — or less than 1% — in improper payments. Most of the erroneous payments were overpayments to living people.
In early January, the U.S. Treasury clawed back in federal payments — not just Social Security payments — that improperly went to dead people, a recovery that former Treasury official David Lebryk said was “just the tip of the iceberg.”
The money was reclaimed as part of a five-month pilot program after Congress gave the temporary access to the “Full Death Master File” for three years as part of the omnibus appropriations bill in 2021. The SSA maintains the most complete federal database of individuals who died, and the file contains more than 142 million records, which go back to 1899, according to the Treasury.
Treasury estimated in January that it would recover more than $215 million during its three-year access period, which runs from December 2023 through 2026.
What are some of the concerns about misinformation on Social Security payments?
To pick the places in the federal government where error rates are high, “Social Security would be near the bottom of the list, not near the top,” said Chuck Blahous, a senior research strategist at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. "Medicaid improper payment rates are quite substantial, and soared after the Medicaid expansion of" the Affordable Care Act.
“By all means — go after any improper payments that are found, but let’s not pretend that’s where the system’s biggest financial problems are,” he said.
Sita Nataraj Slavov, a professor of public policy at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University, said the claims by Musk and Trump will make people think the solutions to the government's financial problems are simpler than they appear.
“The real concern is that this claim may mislead people into thinking there’s an easy fix to Social Security’s financial problems — that we can somehow restore solvency without making sacrifices through higher taxes or lower benefits,” Slavov said. “This is simply not true.”
What does the White House say about the criticism?
Karoline Leavitt, the White House spokesperson, referred back to the Social Security's inspector general report.
“A previous investigation revealed the SSA paid at least $71.8 billion in improper payments,” she said. "The Social Security Administration is now working to find even more waste, fraud, and abuse in the Administration’s whole-of-government effort to protect American taxpayers.”
Related
Pinpointing the genesis of “waste, fraud and abuse” as political rhetoric is difficult. But the concept is older than the nation: Think “taxation without representation.”
Related
King's exit from the administration is one of several departures of high-ranking officials concerned about DOGE staffers' potential unlawful access to private taxpayer information.
Related
If successful, Musk and his group would have access to millions of tightly controlled files that include taxpayer information, bank records and other sensitive records.